Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg vs Dmitry Popko Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In recent months, Popko has outperformed Wayenburg on second serve points, winning 46.56% compared to Wayenburg's 44.59%. Could this marginal advantage influence the match outcome?
• Wayenburg has excelled in return games, notably securing 47.97% of points from opponents' second serves, surpassing Popko's 43.08%. Does this suggest a potential edge for Wayenburg?
• On first serve returns, Wayenburg slightly leads with 28% compared to Popko's 25.2%. How might this reflect in the upcoming match?
• Defensively, Popko is stronger under pressure, saving 53.3% of breakpoints, while Wayenburg manages 47.44%. Will Popko's composure under pressure be crucial?
• Over the past year, Popko has a marginally better match win rate at 50.68% versus Wayenburg's 49.28%.
• When examining their preferred surfaces, Popko plays best on clay courts with a 65% win rate, whereas Wayenburg favors indoor hard courts at 61%. Could surface preference play a decisive role?
• In tournaments, Popko has competed at a slightly higher level, winning 53.97% of matches in Challengers/ITF > $10K compared to Wayenburg's 45% win rate. How might this experience affect the match?
• The average ranking of opponents Popko has faced is 260.6, compared to Wayenburg’s 377.45, indicating Popko has encountered stronger competition regularly. Does this give him an edge?
• In deciding sets, Popko has a minor advantage, winning 44% compared to Wayenburg’s 43% across all matches in the past year.
• When converting breakpoints, both players are nearly even, with Popko converting 34.51% compared to Wayenburg's 33.91%.

Editorial Prediction (May 6, 2025, UTC):

Looking at recent stats, Popko shows a slight advantage in second serve performance and resilience under pressure, winning more breakpoints and saving more when threatened. These factors could provide a critical edge in key moments of the match.

Wayenburg, however, demonstrates superior return game capabilities, particularly on opponents' second serves. This strength could present challenges for Popko, especially if Wayenburg capitalizes on Popko's serves.

Considering their performances under pressure and against higher-ranked opponents, Popko seems to possess a slight advantage in overall match readiness. His stronger record on clay courts further supports his case for success in this encounter, assuming the match takes place on a similar surface.

Taking all factors into account, Popko appears to be the probable winner for the upcoming match, with his slightly superior stats likely tipping the balance in his favor.